People all around Lake Michigan are asking
questions about the nine-year decline in yellow
perch populations. What caused the decline? How long will it go
on? What can be doneif anythingto reverse it?
Unfortunately, the questions are much more
abundant than the answers. Like all wild species, yellow perch are
part of an intricate ecosystem that is difficult to understand in
every detail. The numbers and health of the fish are determined by
a host of interacting factors.
Some Basic Facts
Researchers know several important things
about the population crash. The most important one is that few young
perch are surviving to adulthood. The causes of this "recruitment
failure" are not known, but the effects are clear: with few perch
surviving their early years, the average age of the population is
increasing quickly. Natural mortality is now removing about 25 percent
of the population each year.
A related fact is that the percentage of
females in the population has declined swiftly during the 1990s. In
1998, females in Wisconsin waters of southern Lake Michigan constituted
only 20 percent of the perch population. This imbalance is due in
part to the faster growth rate of females compared with males. Because
females grow faster than males, they are harvested sooner than males.
When recruitment occurs at normal levels,
the faster growth rate of females does not drastically upset the male/female
balance of the population. However, the recruitment failure during
the last decade means that new females are not replacing the old ones
lost to fishing and natural mortality. With few females available
to spawn, the yellow perch population could collapse.
Learning More
In response to this alarming situation,
agencies and universities from the four states bordering Lake Michigan
have launched a collaborative research and management effort. In 1994,
the Lake Michigan Technical Committee of the Great
Lakes Fishery Commission formed the Yellow Perch Task Group and
charged it with developing a multi-state research initiative on the
dynamics of the perch population. A significant portion of this effort
is being supported by the Sea
Grant programs of Wisconsin,
Michigan, and Illinois-Indiana.
The remainder is backed by funds and personnel from state and tribal
fishery management agencies and commercial and sport fishing groups
around the lake.
Drawing on the expertise of university scientists
and agency biologists from the region, the task group identified 16
factors that may be contributing to the population decline, all related
to the early life of yellow perch. These include predation by alewives,
unusual weather, and starvation of larval perch. Any or all of these
factorsand possibly othersmay be responsible for the recruitment
failure. Thoroughly investigating each one would require resources
far beyond those currently available. Consequently, the task group
is focusing on the most probable factors.
The task group is also standardizing assessment
methods from state to state. Previously, states used different kinds
of sampling gear and measured populations differently. Standardized
methods will allow states to compare their year-to-year assessments
in more meaningful ways.
Good News and Bad News
The taskgroup found mixed results in sampling
and tagging assessments during the summer of 1998. Yellow perch were
found to be reproducing throughout the lake, but the numbers were
highly variable. According to Bill Horns, Great Lakes Fisheries Coordinator
for the Wisconsin Department
of Natural Resources and member of the task group, reproduction
last spring was good in Indiana waters and moderate in Green Bay,
but it continued to be poor in other areas of the lake. Horns also
said fishing will not improve until the lake sees several years in
a row of strong reproduction.
Wisconsin Sea Grant Research
During the summer of 1997, Fred Binkowski
and his colleagues at the Wisconsin Aquatic Technology and Environmental
Research (WATER)
Institute in Milwaukee examined the early life history of perch from
Green Bay, greater Lake Michigan, Lake Ontario, and Lake Mendota in
Madison. This research, supported by UW
Sea Grant, found no problems with the earliest life stages of
Lake Michigan perchfertility, hatching, and survival rates were
roughly comparable with perch from the other locations. As they matured,
however, Lake Michigan perch took twice as long as the other perch
to advance from one food size to the next. Binkowski said this is
probably related to the gape of the mouth, which determines when fish
can progress to the next larger food size. However, it could be also
be related to feeding behavior. Further analyses must be conducted
before the results are conclusive.
Binkowskis group has preserved more
than 10,000 perch specimens from this study. These will be examined
for swim bladder inflation, size at first feeding, growth rates, abnormal
development, and other early life information.
Binkowski has also maintained live samples
of the Lake Michigan perch in his laboratory for the past year and
a half. His group is investigating their sex ratios, growth rates,
and survival rates. A sex ratio close to 50:50, as he expects to find,
would mean that the low percentage of females in Lake Michigan is
not due to biological factors but to females being harvested faster
than males.
More UW
Sea Grant-sponsored research into the problem was launched last
summer. In March, Binkowski and his colleagues began a four-year project
to examine the genetic condition, growth rates, population size, and
mortality rates of young-of-the-year perch in southern Lake Michigan.
The team spent much of the summer on the lake, gathering data on the
population size, growth rates, and movements of larval and post-larval
yellow perch. They also studied the interactions of perch with potential
predators. These data are being analyzed this winter.
The researchers also accomplished the critical
first steps of several laboratory experiments, collecting and preserving
thousands of samples of larval and post-larval perch. These samples
will be analyzed for potential maternal effects on the condition of
young perch. This genetic analysis is a measure of the fishes
health and its effect on their survival.
In another study this past summer supported
by UW Sea Grant
and the Wisconsin DNR, Binkowski
and Brian Belonger of WDNR looked at the yellow perch of Green Bay,
where recruitment problems have not been as severe as in the rest
of Lake Michigan.
Binkowski and Belonger found reasons for
cautious optimism in Green Bay: This summers young-of-year class
was the sixth largest in the last 20 years, and the highest since
1991. This appears to be the result of an unusually warm spring, which
fostered higher growth rates than usual. The faster perch grow, the
shorter time they are vulnerable to predators. Furthermore, two of
their common predators, alewives and white perch, were less abundant
this year than in recent years.
This years higher survival rate will
probably result in greater numbers of spawning fish in the spring
of 2000, although many unpredictable factors could affect the class
between now and then. To fully restore the perch population of Green
Bay, strong year classes would be needed for several years in a row.
Other Sea Grant Research
Other teams of researchers supported by
the Michigan and
Illinois-Indiana
Sea Grant programs are examining the population size, growth rates,
and survival rates of yellow perch in southern Lake Michigan. They
are also measuring fat content to determine the fishes health
and examining possible alewife predation on perch larvae and starvation
of young yellow perch due to competition for zooplankton from exotic
species such as zebra mussels and the spiny water flea. UW
Sea Grant will relay highlights of these investigations as results
develop.
Other Efforts
This winter, the WDNR will conduct its
annual graded mesh gill net assessment, which will provide information
on the status of all year classes (see graph at right showing data
from 1986 - 98 in two age brackets).
Other aspects of the perch problem are
being addressed by researchers from the following institutions: Ball
State University in Indiana; Central Michigan University; Michigan
State University; Purdue University; DNR agencies from Michigan, Indiana,
and Illinois; and the Illinois Natural History Survey.
The Nature of Nature
Fisheries managers around Lake Michigan
have responded to the alarming yellow perch situation by closing commercial
fishing in their waters. Daily bag limits for sport fishing have been
reduced throughout the lake.
The efforts of the Yellow Perch Task Group
promise a better understanding of the population dynamics of this
favorite fish. However, even if scientists and managers do come to
understand the causes of the decline, they may not be able to reverse
it. For example, little could be done to rid Lake Michigan of zebra
mussels, even if they were primarily responsible for the decline of
yellow perch.
The size of the yellow perch population
has fluctuated for many years. Although the current crash is the most
severe, it may be part of normal ups and downs of the population.
Until much more can be learned about this complicated system, such
dramatic changes can be considered simply "the nature of nature."
UW
Sea Grant will keep you informed as Sea Grant researchers and
the Yellow Perch Task Group assemble more pieces of the perch puzzle.