The Northern Leopard Frog is a sentinel species, a harbinger of poor environmental health--especially in the river regions that flow into the Great Lakes. In Dr. William Karasov’s lab on the University of Wisconsin-Madison campus, the frog is front and center in a series of research experiments, funded in part by the UW Sea Grant Institute, designed to explore how environmental toxins may be affecting the frog’s immune system, growth and development.
From birth until metamorphosis, the point at which the frog’s forelimbs begin to emerge Karasov, professor and chair of the UW-Madison’s Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, and Tawnya Cary, a first-year PhD student, have fed Northern Leopard Frog tadpoles a pre-prepared diet that includes a static level of polybrominated diphenyl ethers--PBDEs for short-- toxic compounds often used as flame retardants in manufacturing. Their goal is to measure the potential impact of PBDEs on survival, growth rate, and the amount of time it takes for the tadpole to develop into a frog.
“These contaminants can create a situation where animals can suffer direct effects, and also weaken their immune systems, making them vulnerable to other pathogens in the environment,” explained Karasov.
He points to situations where large groups of dead frogs have been found by naturalists in the wild. “We’ve never really known if a weakened immune system is the problem.”
While there’s been plenty of research on the dangerous environmental effects of the more commonly known polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) that appear in high concentrations in the rivers flowing into the Great Lakes, PBDEs, by contrast, have gone almost entirely unexamined.
“That’s where we began. We wanted to get a very fast start on this, because nobody has looked at it yet,” said Karasov.
As it turns out, it’s a good thing Karasov and Cary did. Their initial findings, published in a recent issue of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, show that the PBDE-tainted diet both increased mortality and stunted growth among the tadpoles. Other experiments have shown that the toxin doesn’t appear to damage the frog’s immune system or make it more susceptible to infection from common funguses and bacterium, such as aeromonas, commonly found in the Great Lakes coastal region. That’s a question Karasov and Cary will be exploring in greater detail in the coming year.
Karasov and Cary’s work is on the front lines of a new research discipline called immunoecology, aimed at creating a better understanding of the ways the immune functions of several animal species develop and protect them in their natural environment. Karasov is also studying development of immune function in nestling birds.
“Frogs play an important role in our ecosystem—they’re a key part of the food web,” said Cary. “It’s a heads-up as to why we should be concerned about this, and how it could affect humans."